× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



In this case the functions are very simple. Each of the functions
described would get a different field out of the same file.   I'm just
wondering if this is an I/O nightmare in the making.  

Dave

>>It depends on how complex your functions are.
>>Rule of thumb I use with my UDFs is to make them as simple as possible
>>(single purpose functions).
>>If your UDFs are rather simple (i.e. add these two numbers and return
the
>>sum, convert decimal to date), there shouldn't be much overhead.
>>If each function runs another SQL statement in turn and the FROM file
has
>>lots of records, I can see lots of 'slamming' going on.
>>
>>Test in on a large file.
>>
>>Elvis
>>



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.