× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Would you choose:

1. RAID 1
2. RAID 5
3. Other

Why?

Primary use will be web application serving and a WDSC workstation.
While they're not entirely compatible workloads, if the WDSC environment
is used for host editing and web testing, it will have a similar profile
to a web application server.

Joe

P.S. I find that RAID requires 100% disk overhead: each disk requires a
RAID disk.  RAID 5 requires 50% or less (one RAID drive per set so the
more drives in the set the better, but at some point performance begins
to be an issue).  RAID 5 is supposed to be faster on READs, slower on
WRITEs.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.