MIDRANGE dot COM Mailing List Archive



Home » MIDRANGE-L » June 2005

RE: RPGIII compiler vs Visual Basic



fixed

Honestly Joe, your answer was quite clear and I do agree with most of what 
you say (and like you, I too am almost ready to stop arguing because I'm 
just plain tired of it).

1 - TSM did not reach the end of it's cycle.  It's being enhanced.  It's 
very popular.  It's just that IBM isn't putting any of the new versions on 
i5/os.  Why not?

2 - If TSM is just a product, couldn't the RPG compiler be thought of as 
the same way?  I mean, they both show up on DSPSFWRSC.  Has IBM dropped 
languages in the past for the AS/400, like BASIC, RM-COBOL, FORTRAN, etc? 
There's already lots of grumbling that it would be nice to drop the 
RPG/400 compiler to push people to the RPG ILE compiler.  But as you could 
point out, IBM still has the RPG II compiler going on it.

Rob Berendt





Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2014 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact