Going back further, I doubt adding multiple thread support to
interactive jobs will do much for increasing sales for IBM.
Not many are going to the type of program Steve is describing using a
5250 display. If written as client/server, a GUI or web frontend could
just as easily be used. The batch job would then use thread support if
Going back to the origin, I think he is basing it on the fact that
interactive does not support threads but batch does. He's trying to
figure out why interactive has this limitation. I guess if it's on OS/400
we'll call it a limitation, but if it's on Windows we'll call it a bug.
This thread ...
- RE: Hmmmm.....$1 Billion, (continued)