× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Jim,

That's good to hear.   Question:  do you develop your database
exclusively via ops nav?

On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:00:57 -0600, Reinardy, James
<jreinardy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I am currently managing a corporate IS department that uses the iSeries
> for its primary business application.  However, my background is much
> more rooted in Sybase, SQL Server and in particular Oracle.  My
> experience with DB2/400 is that it now competes feature for feature with
> the other databases, but this may be a a recent development. I believe
> that IBM has been playing catch up with the SQL functions of DB2/400
> compared to the competition, including its own UDB product, but is just
> about there now with v5r2 and beyond.  I have been pretty successful at
> introducing new techniques to my department by assuming since Oracle has
> it, there is probably a similar feature in DB2/400.  We discovered SQL
> triggers, SQL views and the SQL tools in Operations Navigator that way.
> I have yet to be disappointed to find that there was not a feature I was
> looking for.
> 
> I will admit to some misgivings about the proprietary nature of the
> hardware and OS compared to the Oracle world I am used to, but I have no
> complaints about the robustness of the software, including the database.
> 
> Jim Reinardy
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe Pluta
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:35 PM
> To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
> Subject: RE: Question about UDB on iSeries
> 
> > From: Dave Odom
> >
> > UT the reality is, it and DB2 are not usually used in the same
> > environments and for the same types of applications and reasons as the
> 
> > mainframe.
> 
> I'm interested in this statement!  Do mainframes not do CICS-type
> applications anymore?  Because for the life of me I can't discern the
> difference between CICS-based order entry in COBOL and green-screen
> order entry in RPG IV (or NEP-MRT order entry in RPG II, for that
> matter).
> 
> If your contention is that mainframes are used more for data warehousing
> on multi-terabyte databases, then I guess you're probably right there.
> The iSeries is only just beginning to target that environment, although
> from what I understand EVIs and the like make the iSeries a pretty nice
> platform for those things.
> 
> > There are reasons why mainframe shops and mid-range shops using RDMBs
> > like DB2 and Oracle went with those
> engines
> > and platforms and not with the iSeries.
> 
> What are the reasons?
> 
> > In addition, most iSeries shops I know of, since they have been
> > influenced by Rochester and tend to move only in that environment and
> > have done so for decades, don't have an unbiased view of how different
> 
> > the DB2/400 implementation is from the rest of IBM and why that is not
> 
> > necessarily good.
> 
> Actually, we didn't even know we were running DB2 until we were told so
> by IBM.  Until then we were just running OS/400 (or CPF).  We just knew
> we had the fastest database on the planet for the type of navigational
> access that best describes business logic.
> 
> > One of the questions that should be answered is, "but with all that,
> > can DB2/400 be used wisely and in keeping with the
> tenets
> > usually found in the rest of the RDBMs world and why is that important
> 
> > to my business?"
> 
> Can you provide these tenets?  Or better yet point out where they are
> published.  Can I see them online somewhere?  Download them?
> 
> Joe
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
> moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> 
>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.