× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



> Instead of just stuffing the ballots in a box they would be inserted into
> the reader.
Thats why the infrared port some electronic devices have should be disabled
(not just
taped over...)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "York, Albert" <albert.york@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: electronic voting tomorrow


> I think a reasonable solution would be portable ballot readers on site.
> Instead of just stuffing the ballots in a box they would be inserted into
> the reader. It would validate that the ballot was punched correctly and
> could periodically dial up a central server to send interim results.
>
> Albert York
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of rob@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:56 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: RE: electronic voting tomorrow
>
> Do paper ballots have instant offsite backup in case of fire or flood?
> Did paper ballots stop the absentee ballot from the dead guy that made the
> news?
> With electronic journalling of all records, will it be harder for a local
> clerk to abscond with some paper ballots?
>
> I am sure that it will go to the Supreme Court.  Being gracious and
> accepting defeat has gone the way of the dodo bird.  It's like trying to
> get a law passed.  Don't want to bother?  Have it done by judicial fiat
> instead.
>
> Rob Berendt
> -- 
> Group Dekko Services, LLC
> Dept 01.073
> PO Box 2000
> Dock 108
> 6928N 400E
> Kendallville, IN 46755
> http://www.dekko.com
>
>
>
>
>
> "Dan Bale" <dbale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 11/01/2004 04:42 PM
> Please respond to
> Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> To
> "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Fax to
>
> Subject
> RE: electronic voting tomorrow
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I trust paper ballots far, FAR more than electronic ballots.  Not even
> close.  No contest.
>
> As I see it, the big difference between paper and electronic is that with
> paper, you always have the physical evidence.  You can see why there are
> unexpected discrepancies and the causes (hanging chads, etc.)  I can look
> at
> my ballot and match it up to the legend that I punched it from.  (And I
> always do this.)
>
> With electronic voting, no one, with the *possible* exception of the
> person(s) who wrote the programs, knows what happens exactly when a screen
> button is pushed.  A vote bit is sent through a gamut of instructions for
> which there are zero auditing capabilities.  It lands in a pool,
> hopefully,
> and in the right pool, hopefully.  If someone screams "cheat!", how will
> anyone ever verify?  To my knowledge, the auditing capabilities are
> totally
> insufficient.
>
> If you're cynical about what happens to a paper ballot after you return it
> to be counted, well then, you're not doubting the technology so much as
> you
> are the people responsible for ensuring every vote counts.  This type of
> cynicism precedes our lifetime.
>
> Overall, if "the people" lose the trust of the electoral process, it is an
> open invitation to anarchy.
>
> Who's giving odds that this election won't go before the Supreme Court
> again?
>
> db
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / rob@xxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 4:21 PM
> >
> > Nothing is trusted anyway.  Not paper ballots.  Not mechanical paper
> > ballots (hanging chads).  Nothing.  There will always be an argument
> > saying why it's bad.  Thus, should all attempts to improve be
> permanently
> > shelved?  After all, if it's all going to be tied up in the
> > courts anyway,
> > why spend the money on trying to improve the equipment when it could be
> > better spent on something less controversial?
> >
> > Rob Berendt
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.