|
We have a 270-23F1 running LPAR. The second partiton is Linux running as a host. That definitely is not what you'd call a beefy machine. Rob Berendt -- Group Dekko Services, LLC Dept 01.073 PO Box 2000 Dock 108 6928N 400E Kendallville, IN 46755 http://www.dekko.com Pat Barber <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 08/18/2004 01:28 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Fax to Subject Re: LPAR on very small machines Well, this doesn't clear it up but has a LOT of facts surrounding LPARS and several new "terms" that I have not seen before. LPARS are not for the "faint of heart" or "faint of the wallet"... http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/lpar/pdf/LPAR_FAQ_V1.00.pdf I would not plan on LPARS for anything under a very high 520 at the very least. Al Barsa wrote: > My 520 has .43 processors (isn't that user friendly), and each processor > can support up to 10 partitions. -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
