× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Not sure, Walden - depends, esp. if access paths get shared. But that might not happen, depending on a number of things - access path size attribute, e.g., other stuff, I suppose. Smae story - share all you can, but things have changed quite a bit.

Vern

At 04:42 PM 7/5/2004, you wrote:
>The hit comes from access path maintenance....

But, if you need in access path to enforce, say, the relationship from
Order Detail to Order Header, you'll need an index on Order Header by
Order Number. Chances are you already have that, so is there really a
hit for index maintenance, since that index is already there?

-Walden


------------ Walden H Leverich III President & CEO Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.TechSoftInc.com

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vern Hamberg
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 7:45 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: RE: Doohickey to visually show relationships between files

db

The hit comes from access path maintenance - that is separate from what
the
system does that is the same as the RPG code did - but the system may
handle that stuff better, so maybe there's a tradeoff?

About the "could" - isn't that the face-saving word of the hour from IBM

all the time?   ;-)

Vern

At 12:20 PM 7/1/2004, you wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Vern Hamberg
> >
> > But putting RI into things has implications for performance and
> > changes in
> > applications. RI will generate messages you need to handle, it'll
> > actually
> > DO things you used to do in code, etc. And every constraint is
actually
> > maintained as an additional access path, so performance could have a
hit.
> >
> > ;-)
> > Vern
>
>Knowledge will come with practical experience, I'm sure, but I wonder
why
>performance would suffer if you're letting the system handle the stuff
you
>would otherwise do in RPG (or other) code.  If anything, I would think
>performance would be better.
>
>I did see that you qualified that with "could".
>
>db


-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


-- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.