Re: PROBLEM WITH V5R3 -- Can anybody suggest a way to . . .

there are many things you might try in a C pgm
that could have security problems, even though
the profile might be even qsecofr. Is all your
access in the C pgm thru an ibm approved api?
Is the system security level same on each machine? (sysval qsecurity)
Is the restore of this program successful? there are
system values that can stop restore of pgms that adopt auth.
check QALWOBJRST  *SEC     Allow object restore option   - this changed in
v5r3!
QALWUSRDMN  *SEC     Allow user domain objects in libraries
Again the audit journal would indicate.
jim


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: PROBLEM WITH V5R3 -- Can anybody suggest a way to . . .


> > My first guess is an authority problem.  Any chance that auditing is
> > turned on???
> >
> > Anything in the FTP jobs joblog??
>
> As far as authority goes, we're running with a user profile that's got
> enough authority to install QuestView (i.e., bloody damned close to
> QSECOFR-level).
>
> As to the joblog, it took a bit of futzing around to find the job, but
> there wasn't a single message in it from my retrieval program. I got
> messages in the joblog when I misspelled the name of the program, but not
> from simply running it and getting the wrong results.
>
> --
> JHHL
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>