Re: QFRCCVNRST

On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 14:42, James H H Lampert wrote:
> Would anybody happen to know:
> 
> 1. When was the QFRCCVNRST system value introduced,
> 
> 2. What possible reason would it have for having a possible values
> requiring conversion of all restored objects (whether they need it or
> not),
> 
> 3. Why would anybody in his or her right mind actually set it to convert
> everything, whether it needs it or not?
> 
> WHAT WERE THEY THINKING?!?
> 


1. CISC to RISC
2. CISC to RISC
3. CISC to RISC


any questions??  <VBG>


> --
> JHHL
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
-- 
"Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same."
-- Oscar Wilde