× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If you are able to operate without the token ring adapter active, vary it
off and try your speed test again.

A few months ago I was experiencing degraded performance as well. Disabling
the token ring card correcting it immediately.

Ken Slaugh (707) 795-1512 x118
Chouinard & Myhre, Inc.
http://www.cm-inc.com/ 

It'd have a hard job - the virtual LAN is the only active link at present. 
The other cards (token ring & Gigabit ethernet) have nothing connected to
them. There are also dedicated LAN console cards hooked up to our network,
but they don't appear in any of the defined routes or host table entries.
Nothing outside of the vLAN can be pinged from the LPARs in question. I'll
ask our BP about it tomorrow, as they've set it up. 

The reason I'm doing this is because we tend to use SAVRSTOBJ a lot, and
that doesn't work over the vLAN as SNA is required[1]. A couple of LPARs
will still have token ring, but the rest won't. I've put together an FTP
based equivalent that's faster than the token ring on our current system,
but it seems way short of the speeds I'd expect. 

Regards, Martin



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.