RE: Test Development System Survey -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

We have cloned some of our batch processes using our test libraries. We run a complete invoicing cycle in a set of test libraries. This runs automatically using Help Systems' ROBOT scheduler.

The output queues for the application in question live in the data library of the application. In test, output queues of the same name live in the test library, so there's a reduced risk of contamination. At least one group of programs forces the output to a non-production library (yes, we did have a leak at one time).

--Paul E Musselman
PaulMmn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Paul - did I read that you use live data for testing?  Apart from
possible data protection legislation (I assume that you have that in the
USA?) there is always the possibility that the orders could get through
to the factory for picking.  If the data is scrambled then it satisfies
both the conditions to avoid being carried through by picking and also
doesn't include any real customer information.

I'm glad to see you test batch jobs - but is this all done manually?

Jamie

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.