× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



<RANT>
Sometimes I really hate (is that too strong of a word?)  LCD's.  if you are
going to hire someone to work on a computer, shouldn't they have at least
some intuitive skill when it comes to working with new screens, processes,
or what ever you want to call it .

I know that is not the way we [programmers] are supposed to think, being in
the service business and all, but there have been times when I have been
asked to make something so simple that it practically can run it self.  

Ease of use, fine.  But idiot proof?  How did that saying go... Build a
system that even a ... 

</RANT>


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Dan [mailto:dbcemid@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent:   Friday, June 27, 2003 11:20 AM
To:     Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject:        Re: edit a *QRYDFN query outside of WRKQRY interface?

Guys, 

Literally, this is a request from a lazy or efficient (take your pick; I
pick efficient)
programmer.  Why the WRKQRY command has no command line parameters is beyond
me.

Rob, this is mostly a query maintenance issue.  I don't actually run most of
these queries. 

Bill, Vern,
Yes, I am aware of the QM queries.  I have converted *qrydfn's to these in
the past.  Currently, I
would face resistance (and I have too many battles to fight now that I don't
need to add another)
to doing this since we have a policy of "support LCD" (Least Common
Denominator).  Yes, LCD, the
arch-enemy of the technically frustrated.  :-(

Also, some of the queries I support eventually get maintained by endusers,
so that precludes QM
queries right there.  Besides, if I *really* had my druthers (and had to
choose between qmqry and
sql), I'd just convert the *qrydfn's to SQL.  Our shop is on a path to
learning SQL beyond simple
selects, as I hear the next Lawson version is heavy on SQL.

Bill, you are so right on with the ugly qmqry output.  In the past, I have
had to change a working
*qrydfn to a qmqry, and the users hated it so much it ended up getting
trashed for an RPG program!

Thanks for the suggestions!

- Dan

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.