|
Al, > I can tell you right now that IBM would reject the proposal at a job level. > When I campaigned (rather loudly) that the 25/250 library list limit be made a system value and job attribute, I got the piddily response of the data area solution because this part of OS/400 development was too heavily burdened. 1) Just because they were overtaxed then doesn't mean that that is the case now. 2) The *LIBL issue might be more of an effort than the spool issue (although it would be *really* helpful to have the *LIBL limit be controlled at the job level. This is giving us some grief now.) 3) If we don't ask for it then they won't know that we need it. -mark -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
