Re: V5R2: SQL enhancements

Given that they don't have a QSYS.LIB file system I don't really see that
the gain is worth breaking the "Q" library rule of thumb, but I take your
point.

Seems to me that this could cause some backup programs to be revisited :)

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
To keep it compatible with other DB2 platforms.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin




Evan Harris <spanner@ihug.co.nz>
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
09/05/2002 02:50 PM
Please respond to midrange-l


        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Fax to:
        Subject:        Re: V5R2:  SQL enhancements


Hi Rob

  I wondered why the hell they dropped the Q prefix....

Regards
Evan Harris

>This is a multipart message in MIME format.
>--
>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>I was reading the following:
>What's new in DB2 Universal Database for iSeries and V5R2
>http://isource.ibm.com/cgi-bin/goto?on=naa5ab0910
>(Great article by the way).
>
>When I saw that V5R2 has a new library, SYSIBM.  Does this replace QSYS2,
>or are they duplicates of each other?
>
>Rob Berendt