Re: Interactive Feature Upgrade Theory

From: Andy Nolen-Parkhouse <aparkhouse@attbi.com>
> My point had to do with IBM's implementation of the interactive
> governor.  In its first appearance, CFINT would trash the entire system
> when you exceeded the threshold.  This affected both interactive and
> non-interactive jobs.  As time has passed, they have attempted to limit
> interactive work to the agreed-upon CPW threshold while still allowing
> batch work to proceed without as great an effect.  That's been their
> stated goal, and they say they've improved.  How well, I don't know.
>

This is easy to check. The result is that it is NOT true that batch is
not affected (at least not through V5R1 - don't know  about V5R2).
Also, from the description of how CFINT-punishment works, it is clear
that every job is affected the same way.