RE: CPW=0 and one session?

Leif,

Putting aside the legal issues for a moment, wouldn't a zero-interactive
machine be a prime candidate for FAST400? Assuming, of course, that you're
only using the machine for development, and not for running a business. ;-)

Lou Schmaus
MIS Director
Apparel Distribution, Inc.
lschmaus@link400.com

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
[mailto:midrange-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Leif Svalgaard
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:59 PM
To: midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: CPW=0 and one session?


music to my ears...

----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Pluta <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: CPW=0 and one session?


> > From: Leif Svalgaard <leif@leif.org>
> >
> > > Further in  my quest for a low cost test system,
> > > there is a rumor that a 270 (or any box for that
> > > matter) with a CPW rating of zero (0) still allows
> > > ONE green screen session (with or without CFINT
> > > penalty?). Can someone confirm or definitely deny
> > > this? Have you tried?
> > > Thanks.
>
> Works fine, Leif.  My model 270 with zero CPW supports as many sessions as
I
> want, as long as no two are doing CPU intensive tasks.  However, run a
> compile in one session and an interactive SQL in the other, and you'll
bring
> the machine nearly to a halt.
>
> There are anomalies.  Stepping through a program using the debugger often
> causes CFINT to kick in.  But in general, it's fine for a single user.
>
> Joe
>


_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.