Re: The Future of the AS/400 (was Re: Developer Lease to 1.75%????)

Thanks Leif I guess I got the wrong impression in some of those talks.

Let me take the occasion to say thank you to you and the ones who have the
wherewithall and knowledge and history to contribute so much here.

-Alan


----- Original Message -----
From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: The Future of the AS/400 (was Re: Developer Lease to 1.75%????)


> but it always was, way back to S/38
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Alan Cassidy <acassidy@pioneermetals.com>
> To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:14 PM
> Subject: Re: The Future of the AS/400 (was Re: Developer Lease to
1.75%????)
>
>
> > Sorry, I thought that was clear in the text following...: "But now they
> have
> > the OS successfully seceded from the hardware.."
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Leif Svalgaard" <leif@leif.org>
> > To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: The Future of the AS/400 (was Re: Developer Lease to
> 1.75%????)
> >
> >
> > > From: Alan Cassidy <acassidy@pioneermetals.com>
> > > > May I second this motion. I even thought once about IBM just
marketing
> > > > OS/400 indpendent of the hardware. It became quickly clear that it
was
> > made
> > > > to fit the hardware.
> > >
> > > I think not. IBM touts the Technology Independent nature of OS/400.
> > > It can run on any hardware.
> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
>