× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
And the exception to prove the rule:  Buying that option to spread certain
queries over multiple processors.

Rob Berendt
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin




John Myers - MM <jmyersmm@sbsusa.com>
Sent by: midrange-l-admin@midrange.com
04/30/2002 02:01 PM
Please respond to midrange-l


        To:     midrange-l@midrange.com
        cc:
        Fax to:
        Subject:        Re: 890 cpw per cpu


Steve,

There is a certain amount of overhead consumed in managing multiprocessor
systems ... the total CPW rating reflects that overhead.  Doing the
division by 32 gives a per processor total that assumes the overhead and
that each processor is being used at 100% of capacity.

As my Motor Vehicle clients say ... "Your results may vary ...".

A 32 processor system will not be 32 times as fast as a one processor
system ... in a commercial workload, different processors will operate at
different percentages of utilization all the time.  Under OS/400, a job
gets dispatched to one processor, which runs it.  Unless OS/400 has
changed
significantly (and I'm very sure that it hasn't), a 32 processor system
will be no faster than a one processor system if only one job is running
in
the system.

HTH ... let me know if you are looking for more detail on this.

John

At 02:47 PM 4/29/2002, you wrote:

>The cpw of the new 890 looks to be about 1170 per cpu.  ( 37,400 / 32 ).
>The cpw per processor of the other iSeries models is about 1070  ( cpw of
>the 270/2432 ).  The 890 runs on a 1.3 GHz Power4 processor. The
processor
>of the 270 runs at less than half that speed ?
>
>Why is the cpw per cpu of the new 890 not higher ?
>
>Does the power4 processor of the 890 actually run at 1.3 GHz?
>
>Steve Richter
>
>
> >i890 REGATTA SERVER
> >The 32-way i890 nearly doubles the processing power of the i840 to
> >37,400 CPW (see Figure 1 in the online version of this article). The
> >1.3 GHz Power4 chips cram 174 million transistors onto two
> >processors and enable the i890 to crank out transactions so fast
> >that it consumes energy at a breakneck pace, requiring 3-phase power
> >and dissipating up to 25,000 kBTUs of heat per hour.
>
> >The i890 triples the I/O capacity of last year's i840, supporting up
> >to 72 TB of disk, 2,047 disk arms, and 256 GB memory. The machine
> >also connects up to 32 Integrated xSeries Adapters (IXAs) and offers
> >up to 534 MB of L2/L3 cache.
>
>
>--
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.