|
At 3/28/02 12:29 AM, you wrote: >1). One of the things that makes them more expensive is that IBM replaces >them, proactively, at their expense, when they are bad. While the "proactive" part is commendable, it's not a really good argument, since their "rock solid" reputation would go downhill very quickly if they didn't. For a comparison on how NOT to do it, see: "Firestone." By a raise of keyboards, how many would voluntarily purchase a Firestone tire when other alternatives are just as available? >2). The high cost of AS/400 integration is one of the things that makes >the AS/400 the lowest cost per user server in the market place. I would agree that a small premium is deserved, not the huge one that is currently charged. -mark
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
