Re: 64-bit -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: 64-bit
From: jpcarr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 22:06:29 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Also,   I believe that each object's Virtual Address is given to it at
creation time.   It has the same virtual address for life (longer).
Persistence.

When the object is deleted(distroyed)  it's virtual addresses are tagged as
"Unusable" and will never be assigned again.

Is that right leif?

Also with 64 or maybe 128 bit addresses,   Rochester could actually make
each iSeries as an extension of everyother iSeries.
with one address space that spans every iSeries that is made.    A  "Super"
cluster?

or am I dreaming?

John Carr

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: 64-bit , Leif Svalgaard

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.