RE: Emulator Interface with Win2k

I agree. Go with native TCP/IP. You get more options, all the usual
suspects, like WRQ Reflection, Personal Communications, Synapse, Client
Access, NetManage Rumba, various ODBC and OLE/DB drivers, etc.

What benefit is there with SNA Server, other than connectivity?

At 10:01 AM 3/20/02 -0800, you wrote:
>Dare,
>
>In this day and age, an SNA gateway represents a huge overhead with
>unnecessary complexity.  Scrub the hard disk and set it up as a Linux
>play pen!
>
>You'll find your network easier to manage if you remove the gateway and
>go direct to the AS/400.
>
>IMHO
>
>Best Regards
>
>Fritz Hayes
>Atwater Associates
>
><snip>
>|
>| I forgot about my SNA Server.  All client pass through this server to
>get
>| to
>| the AS/400
>|
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.