|
Leif: On Thu, 28 February 2002, "Leif Svalgaard" wrote: > From: <rob@dekko.com> > > > SF99510 - cum C2036510 > > SF99097 - HIPER group > > SF99069 - JAVA group > > SF99501 - DATABASE group > > SF99078 - BACKUP and RECOVER group > > SF99156 - HTTP group > > SF99038 - PERFORMANCE TOOLS group > > wouldn't all the rest be included in the cum? In short, no. The group packages are updated more often, so new individual PTFs are reflected in those before the cumes. Further, some PTFs might be included in a group but not in a cume package at all. Those PTFs seem tied to specific LPPs that might not be on all systems and are therefore deemed not appropriate for the more general cumes. (IBM would have to explain the details.) The database group, for example, has contained SQL PTFs that weren't provided in cumes. (Even further, some PTFs might be so specific to various configurations or installations that they must be individually ordered and won't be in groups nor cumes.) I still haven't decided whether the idea of "group" packages was an improvement. Tom Liotta -- Tom Liotta The PowerTech Group, Inc. 19426 68th Avenue South Kent, WA 98032 Phone 253-872-7788 Fax 253-872-7904 http://www.400Security.com ___________________________________________________ The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe Better! Faster! More Powerful! 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now! http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
