|
Le jeu. 21 févr. 2002 13:52:27, Jeff Crosby écrivait: > Forgive me if I've been pulling a Rip Van Winkle, but I was under > the impression that V5R1 has become fairly stable to load. > > But on another list there have been some posts implying otherwise, > without specifics. And IBM extending support for V4R5 until > December is interesting . . . > > So what is the current scoop on V5R1? We found a problem with some SQL RPG programs. See the APAR number SE02314. The programs were bad designed : difference between the number of host variables and the number of columns in a FETCH INTO. In V4R5 this is accepted. In V5 it is not. > > -- > -Jeff > > The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily > the opinion of my company. Unless I say so. > -- Cordialement/Best regards Marc Rauzier Opinions I stated here are my own.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
