RE: Multithreading (was 'more good iseries news') -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Multithreading (was 'more good iseries news')
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:27:37 -0700 (MST)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Bob Crothers wrote:

> Argreed.  But even more important than actually creating and destroying
> the thread, are the thread synchronization objects such as Critical
> Sections, Events and Mutex's.
>
> Without these, you WILL corrupt data.  The only question is when.

Yes, those are the "etc." I was refering to.

James Rich
james@eaerich.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.