Re: IBM Ultirum Tapes

Subject: Re: IBM Ultirum Tapes
From: "Bruce Kraabel" <brukraa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:44:47 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe>

We've been useing FUJI and also EMTEC.  Haven't experienced any problems
with either, but they haven't been given the test-of-time yet either.




Is there any reason to stick with the more expensive IBM tapes for my
Ultrium drive?  Anyone have experience with Fuji film or HP versions?

This thread ...

IBM Ultirum Tapes , Alan Novick

<Possible follow-ups>
Re: IBM Ultirum Tapes, Bruce Kraabel <=
Re: IBM Ultirum Tapes , MWalter

Re: IBM Ultirum Tapes , Dare

Prev by Author: RE: QSecOfr DST Profile
Next by Author: Re: *SQLPKG question
Previous by thread: IBM Ultirum Tapes
Next by thread: Re: IBM Ultirum Tapes
Index(es):

Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2010 by MIDRANGE dot COM and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available here. If you have questions about this, please contact