Re: (changed) DASD usage of IFS objects

Well, we SHOULDN'T be doing any performance collection at all, but that doesn't
mean that someone started something they shouldn't have...

Do you remember where those are stored?


On Fri, 4 Jan 2002 11:31:32 -0500, R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr. wrote:

>
>one area that I noted an extreme increase of DASD usage was the performance
>collections. After going to 5.1 (from 4.3), one of my customers experienced
>the same sort of thing. In a one month period of time, 12G in performance
>collections.
>
>while I have not explored this thoroughly yet, the performance collections
>are turned into performance members for PM400 and the tools reports, and the
>collections also stayed on the system. It also appears that someone had
>turned on ALL in the collection, so it collected a lot.
>
>we deleted them and turned it way down on the collection and things seem
>much more normal now....
>
>don't know if you have this too, but it's worth looking at. the go disktasks
>will report these objects too.
>
>===========================================================
>R. Bruce Hoffman, Jr.
> -- IBM Certified Specialist - iSeries Administrator
> -- IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer
>
>"I want to be different, just like everybody else!"
>  - Ceili Rain
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
>To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
>visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l
>or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@midrange.com
>Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
>at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>


Rich Herdman
email: rherdman@columbus.rr.com
www:  http://home.columbus.rr.com/herdman/

"It never does to leave a live Dragon out
of the equation." - Bilbo Baggins, 'The Hobbit'