× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. January 2002

Re: ACCPTHSIZ perfomance - *MAX1TB vs *MAX4GB

Steve,
    1. DSPFD FILE(TIGER400/FPPABC) TYPE(*ATR) OUTPUT(*OUTFILE) and specify
*LF or *PF and you get
                     and you get field PHAPSZ    ( Access path size
0=*MAX4GB, 1=*MAX1TB)
    2. *MAX1TB performs better when there is contention for keys,
irrespective of access path sharing.
-Dave K.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Richter" <srichter@AutoCoder.com>
To: <midrange-l@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: ACCPTHSIZ perfomance - *MAX1TB vs *MAX4GB


> I dont see the ACCPTHSIZ attribute reported in any of the DSPFD outfiles.
> Is it there ?
>
> Are we saying, is IBM saying, that *MAX1TB is a better performer on a
> standalone basis, not just because of ACCPTH sharing ?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.