Re: UPS WorldShip via ODBC - why ODBC? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: UPS WorldShip via ODBC - why ODBC?
From: Douglas Handy <dhandy1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:10:19 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

JT,

>But ODBC...?  After what has been said on this list?  Who needs a
>"saga"...?!?

I do not yet know that ODBC is part of the problem.

My usual gripe about ODBC would be performance, but that won't really be an
issue here since we are dealing with one record at a time, not entire record
sets.  And the tables it reads/writes will have a limited number of records
because I'll only keep in the files those things which are currently in the
warehouse.

Doug

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.