× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. December 2001

Re: Interactive lock down while batch runs

From: "James W. Kilgore" <eMail@James-W-Kilgore.com>
> If the payroll run were only one program I could have the
> interactive caller contain a data queue to sync with the
> SBMJOB process, but the batch process is a series of
> programs, each having their own progress bar...

As Richard Reeve suggested, having each batch program update a data area
(indicating progress), sounds like a good solution.  If the batch programs
are called from a CL program, the CL program can monitor for abnormal end
conditions and pass that event back to the interactive job via the data area
too.

Nathan M. Andelin
www.relational-data.com

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.