RE: SAVxxx SEQNBR(11) bombs if #11 already on tape???

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Thanks, everyone, for confirming what I'm experiencing.

It would appear that IBM needs to correct the help text for the CLEAR
parameter, which conflicts with Larry's and others' statements.

Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400  Ext. 4952
D.Bale@Handleman.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larryt222@aol.com [SMTP:Larryt222@aol.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:26 AM
> To:   midrange-l@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: SAVxxx SEQNBR(11) bombs if #11 already on tape???
>
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
> SEQNBR(1) and SEQNBR(*end) are the only viable sequence numbers.  You
> can use
> 2,3,4 etc. as long as those SEQNBRs are NOT on the tape.  It has been
> like
> this since the 1401/360 days
>
> Larry T.