× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Of course if the app is on SystemA and everybody has multiple sessions into 
SystemA and then uses one session to Telnet to SystemA (or to SystemB and back 
to SystemA or...) and then signs on with a generic profile, then every session 
into the app will have the same originating IP address and user profile. I 
suppose it could even be set up as a group job and be done programmatically.

No matter how you do it, there will always be gaping holes.

After all the messages in this thread, it ought to be obvious by now that the 
effort required to make this work reasonably well cannot possibly measure up to 
the effort needed simply to use the IBM-supplied licensing APIs.

Tom Liotta

On Tue, 31 July 2001, "Leif Svalgaard" wrote:

> 
> From: <Ron@cpumms.com>
> > <<I don't get it.
> > <<It would seem to me that a reasonable (and correct?) and
> > <<fair way of doing this is to count the number of simultaneous
> > <<sessions (no matter who the users are and how they are signed
> > <<on and to what) that are USING MY APPLICATION at any time.
> > <<This is very easy to do.
> > 
> > I agree, this is very easy to do (in fact it's currently what we do now)
> > but this is not what they want. If a user can use two sessions to gain
> > faster access to different parts of the application, why should we charge
> > him twice? Their argument is is that they are only on one session at a
> > time.
> > 
> 
> By golly, I got it ! ! !
> Now, then your problem is to prevent users from ripping you off by
> all using the same user id. I can even see that.
> If I'm using your application on my terminal in my office and
> I go downstairs for some reason and need to access your application
> from a different terminal, then I would be charged twice. Maybe
> this happens so rarely that the customers don't complain about it,
> so counting physical terminals seems to be a reasonable
> compromise.

-- 
Tom Liotta
The PowerTech Group, Inc.
19426 68th Avenue South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone  253-872-7788
Fax  253-872-7904
http://www.400Security.com


___________________________________________________
The ALL NEW CS2000 from CompuServe
 Better!  Faster! More Powerful!
 250 FREE hours! Sign-on Now!
 http://www.compuserve.com/trycsrv/cs2000/webmail/




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.