× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. July 2001

Re: last OS400 ver for M36?

  • Subject: Re: last OS400 ver for M36?
  • From: Douglas Handy <dhandy1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 10:00:16 -0400
 
Jim,

>It's not that hard to move from M36 to S36EE.

That presumes that the client has all the source code, is not using third-party
assembler routines, does not use WSU, does not use uncompatible source
precompilers, etc.

The beauty of the M36 was that it was object level compatible.  If you have all
the source, and it is 100% compatible with the S36EE, then I agree it is not a
hard move.  

Not all M36 installations will fit the prerequisites.

Doug

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.