× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



----- Original Message -----
From: "srichter " <srichter@mail.autocoder.com>
To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:38 PM
Subject: RE: The future of computing


> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: Jim Damato <jdamato@dollargeneral.com>
> Reply-To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:28:53 -0500
>
> >I can remembering anticipating Microsoft's true Windows
> >operating system through quarter after quarter of delay, then catching on
> >that it was really just a half-assed integration of DOS and Windows.
>
> I disagree Jim.
>
> Win95, based on the win32 api was an order of magnitude better than
win3.1.
> And the win32 api was an outstanding product. Ignorant as I am of the mac
os and unix at >that time, I dare say win32 was innovative. All aspects of
the windows os made accessible >to the pgmr via an api. Memory mgmt, tasks,
syncronzing locks, file io, window mgmt, a >device context that abstracted
the printer and display hardware below the api level, etc. Very
>comprehensive, very complete. Add an oop language such as c++ and a pgmr
was much >more productive on win95 than win3.1.

The problem, Steve, is that the only way to feel Windows 95 was innovative
was to compare it to Windows 3.1. Comparing it to other operating systems
showed it as behind the curve.

The only way to like Windows best is to not try anything else.

And I really don't want to get into a religous war over it. Windows
technology is now catching up (I believe) with where OS/2 stopped.

But the vast majority had only 3.1 to compare it with and so felt it was "a
big improvement."

> Steve Richter

Chris Rehm
javadisciple@earthlink.net
If you believe that the best technology wins the
marketplace, you haven't been paying attention.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.