× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: alternative to WebFacing
  • From: "AL Lacayo" <lacayoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:56:20 -0700

Joe,

does revitalization handle subfiles or the windows keyword in DDS?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Pluta" <joepluta@PlutaBrothers.com>
To: <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:43 AM
Subject: RE: alternative to WebFacing


> Jim, what is "too small to run WebSphere"?  Is it possible that you might
be
> able to upgrade?
>
> Low-end model 270's run WebSphere, and you'll be thrilled with the
> performance.  If you can completely web-enable your application, then you
> can run a 0CPW model 270, which has a base cost of around $10,000.  At
that
> point, you'd only be able to use green screens for occasional
maintenance -
> more than one interactive session will kill the machine - but it might be
an
> alternative to trying to add five more pounds of ... stuff to an already
> overloaded bag.
>
> If you can do that, you can use an approach like my revitalization
> architecture.  It's fast and easy to implement.  Or, if you can afford
some
> interactive CPW, you can use IBM's webfacing.  Either one of these,
though,
> uses WebSphere as its primary interface.
>
> If you're adamant about staying away from WebSphere, you can use my
> approach, but run your web interface on a small attached webserver running
> something like Linux or Widnows/2000.  Supposedly webfacing will work this
> way as well, but it may require WebSphere on the other box.  My
architecture
> works with any webserver.  With my design, you can also use a thick
> graphical client rather than a browser.
>
> Joe
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
> > [mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Jim Franz
> > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 6:38 AM
> > To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com; IGNITE400 MEMBERS LIST
> > Subject: alternative to WebFacing
> >
> >
> > is there an alternative to IBMs WebFacing for a system too
> > small to run WebSphere? Prefer without the run-time license
> > of like Seagull. Something reliable?
> > jim
>
> +---
> | This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
> | To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
> | To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
> | To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
> | Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
> +---
>

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.