RE: 3570 c12 tape drive question

We have 6 3570s.  They're great, except we have to keep cleaning those
grabbers.  What a pain!  Very good reliability on our systems.  My .02

jch

-----Original Message-----
From: rob@dekko.com [mailto:rob@dekko.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:30 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: Re: 3570 c12 tape drive question



We have two of them.  One on a V5R1 machine and one on a V4R5 machine.
Both go down like a w!*%$ on a troop ship.  We have the CE in here on a
daily basis, literaly.
V4R5MACHINE: Got CPF5110-Equipment check when switching volumes. And other
messages like MCH1668.
V5R1MACHINE:  Got CPF4513-Timeout, MCH5204-Source/sink resource TAP03 not
available, MCH1668-System object TAP03 partially damaged, and more.
QSYSOPR on V5R1MACHINE had: CPI5922, CPF6797

And every 8 weeks we always apply the latest cum, and the latest group
ptf's for:  Hiper, Database, Backup, etc.

Counting the minutes until our 3581's come in.  When they do, give me a
jingle if you need 3570 tapes.
The 3581 has a higher capacity, but not the speed of the 3590.  And, you
can always count on IBM having something sexier in the works.
That 3590 is fast.  We changed a backup from a 25gb cartridge, (which is no
slouch) and we're impressed.  I have historical data that can track the
changes from an earlier cartridge to a 25gb, from a 25gb to 3590, and a few
others.  If anyone needs some real world comparisons for management buy in,
drop me a line.  I will tell you, that the 3590 needs horsepower to drive
it to full rate.  But we put it on a large bumblebee and are also
impressed.

Rob Berendt

==================
A smart person learns from their mistakes,
but a wise person learns from OTHER peoples mistakes.


 

                    Jeff Crosby

                    <jlcrosby@fwi.com>         To:
MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com                                           
                    Sent by:                   cc:

                    owner-midrange-l@mi        Subject:     Re: 3570 c12
tape drive question                             
                    drange.com

 

 

                    06/21/2001 07:21 AM

                    Please respond to

                    MIDRANGE-L

 

 





rob@dekko.com wrote:

> Still, those 3570's are junk.

Really?  We've had one for about a year now without any problems at all.

--
-Jeff
The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily
the opinion of my company.  Unless I say so.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---