× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: CISC to RISC and Excessive Logical I/O
  • From: "Alexei Pytel" <pytel@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:00:20 -0500


Group PTFs ARE included in cum packages.
Just group PTFs are updated more frequently.

    Alexei Pytel

"The better is the worst enemy of the good"




                                                                                
                   
                    "Bill"                                                      
                   
                    <brobins3d@yahoo.co       To:     <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com> 
                   
                    m>                        cc:                               
                   
                    Sent by:                  Subject:     Re: CISC to RISC and 
Excessive Logical  
                    owner-midrange-l@mi        I/O                              
                   
                    drange.com                                                  
                   
                                                                                
                   
                                                                                
                   
                    06/20/2001 09:54 AM                                         
                   
                    Please respond to                                           
                   
                    MIDRANGE-L                                                  
                   
                                                                                
                   
                                                                                
                   



> Have you applied the DB2 group PTFs? I know others have reported
performance
> related problems that were fixed once these PTFs were installed. I assume
> IBM would have checked this, but who knows.........

This brings up something that just nags me.  Why is there a separate set of
PTF's requiring application in addition to the CUM set?  What could the
logic
possibly be to have approximately 5 Group PTF's in addition to the CUM set?
In
other words, why aren't the Group PTF's in the CUM set?

Bill


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---




+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.