× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: 250 libraries again (was V3R1 QUSRTOOL, *PRDLOD)
  • From: Jim Damato <jdamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:06:45 -0500

It's my opinion that those who asked for this are:

3.  CUSTOMERS dealing with third-party applications that each assume that
they're the only software on the system.

Vendors have been writing their library list hogs for years and haven't felt
any pressure to clean things up.  As a customer, if I run afoul of the 25
library limit because I'm trying to integrate two or more software packages
(as well as in-house development) I'm stuck because the vendors won't
support my integration issues.  They'll only guarantee that their
applications will stay within the 25 library limit while running "vanilla".

Yep, application design is the problem.  Still, AS/400 customers want or
need more than 25 libraries in the user library list because they can't get
all their applications to run well together.  Or, they can't get them to run
without hacking out a whole bunch of CL's to swap library lists and
explicitly override files.  Most of us bought third-party solutions because
we didn't want to do a lot of programming.

I wonder how many of these RTVJOBA CL's are actually being used to
circumvent the 25 library limitation.

My first choice for a solution would be to get every application vendor to
use intelligent, graceful library structures.  It would be nice to see one
data library, one executable library, and one source library per
application.  It would also be nice to see intelligent and consistent use of
the product library.  Perhaps we could see more applications use the
equivalent of an Oracle SID, so that the data library is defined into an
application variable (data area or LDA?) and retrieved for qualified file
overrides.

I'm obviously not going to get my first choice.  I'm glad IBM gave me my
second choice.

-Jim

James Damato
Manager - Technical Administration
Dollar General Corporation
<mailto:jdamato@dollargeneral.com>
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.