× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: NT Costs vs. AS/400
  • From: "Wills, Mike N. (TC)" <MNWills@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:07:08 -0500

Actually I wouldn't doubt the pricing. Which NT is it? NT Server? NT
BackOffice Server? How many user license? What kind of system. 

You can easily spend a few grand on licenses and an additional few grand on
a high quality, high availability server. I went to price watch and found NT
server software for 25 users for $1,150, Windows 2000 Advanced server for
$3,800, and Windows 2000 Internet server (Unlimited Licenses) for
$1,800...granted I went to the high end of the spectrum. Just remember the
more users that will connect the more money it will cost.

If you doubt the pricing, price it out yourself using the same equipment you
were quoted for. I would guess the pricing would be pretty close after
considering the vendors warranty and tech support costs.

Mike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glenn Ericson [SMTP:Glenn-Ericson@att.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 12:46 PM
> To:   MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
> Subject:      Re: NT Costs vs. AS/400
> 
> At 02:59 PM 05/30/2001 -0400, Phil.Kestenbaum@FAIRCHILDPUB.com wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>       I was always under the impression that NT boxes were very
inexpensive 
> compared to AS/400. Today I was quoted a minimum of 25K for an NT box 
> to serve as our web server, utilizing AS/400 data. This makes the 
> upgrade from a 620 to an 820 much more attractive. Is this price 
> correct for NT. Also, the vendor said that it would be hard to get an 
> NT box now, that Microsoft was pushing the Windows 2K.
> 
> 
> 
> Phil to  that you can add all the  extra support needed, the cost of 
> downtime,and on it goes.  I would not put the NT support into the 620  
> as the INS is magnitudes slower then the 820 and its IXAs ( new name), 
> the scalability is also greater in the 8xx series.
> 
>                 
> 
> 
> Regards,
>   
> 
> Glenn
> Ph. (718)898-9805 
> <mailto:Glenn-Ericson@att.net> 
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com. To 
| subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com. To 
| unsubscribe from this list send email to 
| MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com. Questions should be directed to the 
| list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.