× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: why cum ptf apply faster than predicted?
  • From: Kevin H <kevinh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:16:17 -0400

Nice reply..

however,   it is 'hanged', not 'hung'

or, does this digress a little..

k



At 10:36 AM 5/16/2001, you wrote:

>I bet you'd complain if you got hung with a brand new rope!
>
>Be happy.  Find a real problem.  Spend some quality time with a pretty
>friend.
>
>
>
>(Some people may not get the first line.  That's okay - I never did
>either.)
>
>
>Rob Berendt
>
>==================
>Remember the Cole!
>
>
> 
>
>                     "Steve 
> Richter" 
>
>                     <srichter@AutoCoder        To: 
> <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
>                     .com>                      cc: 
>
>                     Sent by:                   Subject:     Re: why cum 
> ptf apply faster than predicted?
>                     owner-midrange-l@mi 
>
>                     drange.com 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>                     05/15/01 09:58 
> PM 
>
>                     Please respond 
> to 
>
>                     MIDRANGE-L 
>
> 
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >There are some situations where loading and applying PTF's can take
>longer -
> >particular if you need certain prerequisites, if some PTF's are applied
>they
> >need to be unapplied before the new ones go on, it depends how many are
> >superseded, what group PTF's you have installed etc. etc.
> >
>
>
>good explanation of the reason for the high side estimate.
>
>But the low side estimate still remains questionable. The cover letter said
>4 to 8 hours.
>
>Is the 4 and 8 hour figure the value for the best and worse case scenario
>on
>a baseline system?
>
>ex: 4 hrs if loading cume on top of a new release on a 520, 8 hrs if
>loading
>on top of a prev cume on the same 520?
>
>Steve
>
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
>MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
>david@midrange.com
>+---
>
>
>
>
>+---
>| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
>| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
>| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
>| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
>| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
>+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.