Re: QCMD

I bet it will be a 'dead heat' they both abandon QCMD the day they Die!

As for the GUI, it's loaded with new function, plenty of bugs, and as
usual is a full order of magnitude slower than the QCMD.  And as an
example, in the system value area you get to mentally map the text
assigned to the sysval in
the GUI to the actual sysval.

I'll stay with QCMD for now.

 - Larry

Laurin Bruck wrote:
> 
> Has anyone seen the new COMMON promotional book for New Orleans.  If you have 
>it please go to page talking about V5R1.  At the end of the first paragraph is 
>an interesting quote.  "IBM says the new graphical interfaces and wizards are 
>so compelling that IBMers are taking bets on who will abandon CALL QCMD first, 
>Sloan or Barsa?"
> 
> I would like MIDRANGE-L start to start a survey on this.  Any takers.
> 
> My bet is that it will be a dead heat that they both will wait until the last 
>minute to declare.
> 
> Al, any comments.
> 
> I bet Jim before Al.

-- 
Larry Bolhuis           | Cogito ergo mercari iSeries 
Arbor Solutions, Inc.   |
(616) 451-2500          |               (I think, therefore I buy iSeries.)
(616) 451-2571 -fax     |
lbolhuis@arbsol.com     |        #3  1951-2001
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---