× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: MIDRANGE-L Digest V4 #368
  • From: Jim Langston <jimlangston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:05:30 -0700
  • Organization: Pacer International

It's called progress.  As in moving forward.

To a certain extend I agree IBM should backward support their OS functions,
but there becomes a point of diminishing return.  Where they can either 
spend a lot of R&D into new development, or in getting old stuff to work
with the new OS.

Your choices seem to be 3.

1. Upgrade your imaging system so it uses Client Access for Windows, or
   Client Access Express.
2. Don't upgrade your OS/400.
3. Upgrade your OS/400 and hope for the best.  If it doesn't work, or doesn't
   work in the future you are either going to have to do #1 to forgetaboutit.

The best solution would be #1, IMO.

Personally, I don't fault IBM on this.  We had a smaller imaging system that
got broke in an OS upgrade too.

Regards,

Jim Langston

Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:16:46 -0400
From: "Steve Richter" <srichter@AutoCoder.com>
Subject: ca/extended dos not supported in v4r5. why not?

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

- ------=_NextPart_000_0033_01C0C35B.34EA8980
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My shop wants to upgrade its 720 from v4r3 to v4r5, but cannot because =
it uses an imaging system running on a pc which connects to the as400 =
using client access for extended dos, 5763-xb1.

A review of posts on this subject indicates that the client access for =
dos will still work under v4r5, but IBM documentation says it is not =
supported and ibm support people say "maybe it will work, maybe it will =
not work".

We cannot be sure that the next time we load a ptf cum that the dos pc =
will be able to connect. And if it does not connect, IBM has stated that =
they will not help resolve any problems.

Why will IBM not assure its customers that ca/dos will work on its =
future releases as it has on past releases?

They can discontinue any "how to" support if they want, we just want =
them to assure us that if they break their own code in the future, that =
they will fix it.

Steve Richter
as400 contract programmer
new york, new jersey.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.