RE: CGI-RPG performance question

Well you getting their.  the VARYING option on the prototype does not mean
the field is defined as variable length.  Now you need to use a variable
length field to send and receive the data as well as the VARYING on the
PR/PI.  I don't have time to look up how I fixed this same type of problem
at this time.  If you don't stumble upon the answer by the end of the day, I
will have more time tomorrow.  (Big install tonight to prepare for.)

HTH

Christopher K. Bipes    mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.        http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive   Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928  Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000

-----Original Message-----
From: Loyd Goodbar [mailto:lgoodbar@ispchannel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 6:11 PM
To: WEB400@midrange.com; midrange-l@midrange.com
Subject: Re: CGI-RPG performance question


Well, my output response has improved tremendously! Thanks Chris and Buck
for
suggesting replacing %trim* with eval. This resulted in a dramatic
improvement
of formatting the HTML. Where before I was getting ~1KB/sec, now I'm getting
~80KB/sec writing to the IFS.

The last noticeable bottleneck is storing the information. I also suspect
the
%trimr I have is again the problem, but I'm not sure how to fix it.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---