× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: RE: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon Scre en
  • From: Joe Giusto <JGiusto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 13:00:50 -0500

27.3601%. (the highest on any one drive on the WRKDSKSTS screen is 72.2%).

It has been suggested that it has something to do with reverse DNS Lookup
and that I should tell the 400 what the addresses are.  The problem with
that is that they are dynamically assigned by the NT server and we are
talking at least 50 users.  Unless there is a way to generically tell the
400 about a range of addresses.


-----Original Message-----
From:   Art Baker [SMTP:Art_Baker@baan.com]
Sent:   Tuesday, January 09, 2001 11:21 AM
To:     'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject:        RE: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon
Scre en

How full is your harddrive-wrksyssts. If your running over 80% it would be
causing these long delays.
Art 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Giusto [mailto:JGiusto@patuxent.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 7:42 AM
To: 'midrange-l@midrange.com'
Subject: Client Access Sessions taking forever to bring up Signon Screen


We are experiencing a very long delay when starting Client Access sessions.
Sometimes it is taking 5 - 10 minutes to get to the signon screen.  This
usually occurs when there is an interactive job that is taking a large
amount of resources.  I have noticed that the job QTVDEVICE is running at
Priority 50.
My thought was to  change this priority to 20 or below so that users will
stop complaining about the delay for the signon screen.  

The question is, where is the best place to do this?  I was thinking about
changing the Class description, but have been unable to determine which one
is being used, and I also do not what other jobs to use this priority (which
would bring the system to it knees if there are other tasks that share this
class/routing entry).

Thank you very much for any suggestions that you can offer.


+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.