× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  • Subject: Re: 8G as a 4G replacement
  • From: Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2001 14:33:27 -0500
  • Organization: Arbor Solutions, Inc

> No way.

  Rats.
 
> This problem will continue to get bigger and bigger, and will particularly
> plague customers in the future when the minimum disk size could potentially
> grow to 17GB, 35GB and then 70GB if we follow the progression of where we
> have been.

  I certainly agree, many of the smaller systems out there already
streached to get 4-4G units just to have RAID. 4-8G units when purchased
new isn't so bad as the prices keep falling, but for the poor guy that
want's to add 4G, he basically has to go used.

  I think the biggest problem we will deal with is as Charly mentioned
earlier: Arm count, or more correctly the LACK of arm count.  Already
you can't cram enough arms in a 170 to feed the CPUs, how bad is it when
we're pouring in 17G (or bigger) drives! 
 
> If you have a need for a 20 GB system, and the minimum DASD size is 70GB,
> what do you do for protection.  In that case, the correct answer may be
> mirroring.  BTW, mirroring will help with the arm contention problem.  But
> what happens if you need with growth to have a system at 140 GB usable, and
> the minimum disk size is 70 GB.  Raid-5 requires a minimum of four devices
> in a parity set!

  It is my opinion that IBM should continue to sell the smaller drives,
even if they are just the larger ones with 'crippling' jumpers or
microcode included (and I have told Mr Jarosh that for the good it'll
do.) Heck, at this point even if they priced them THE SAME as the bigger
drive the customer would save money. IBM has made good strides getting
the entry level systems down in cost but then swat the poor customer
across the face when they want 'just a little more storage'!

  - Larry

-- 
Larry Bolhuis
Arbor Solutions, Inc.
(616) 451-2500
(616) 451-2571 -fax
lbolhuis@arbsol.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.