× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



OBJECTConnect uses SNADS and SNADS is de-tunned if you will so to be a 
background task for things like mail, spoolfiles and not high speed 
transfers. OBJECTConnect is convenient in that it creates the savf, saves 
the object(s), transfers them to system #2 and reverses the process all 
with 1 cmd.

If you are good at writing batch FTP code and using rmtcmd you could write 
you own simple program to do the same and use FTP as the transport.

Overall make sure that under CFGTCP that the "Maximum transmission unit" 
under interfaces is set to   *LIND and 
the "Maximum transmission unit" under routes is *IFC and the lind  SSAP 
Frame Sizes are 1496.



---------------------------------
Kirk Goins
IBM Certified AS/400 Technical Solutions
DataMirror High Availability Certified
Pacific Information Systems - An IBM Premier Business Partner
503-674-2985             kirkg@pacinfosys.com
"WE KNOW TECHNOLOGY"
---------------------------------





Larry Bolhuis <lbolhuis@arbsol.com>
Sent by: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
01/03/01 04:30 PM
Please respond to MIDRANGE-L

 
        To:     Midrange Systems Mailing List <MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Objectconnect speed


Has anyone experience with ObjectConnect and what kind of speed you can
get with the thing? Recently I timed the movement of a single 5GB
physical file and got barely 5Mb/sec speed. The sending machine is an
S20 4-way at V4R2, the receiving machine an 820 2-Way. Neither was doing
anything at the time (CPU <5% on both). The connection is pure SNA over
Ethernet. The Ethernet cards are both 100M and each reports a 100M full
duplex connection. Both are connected to the same Ethernet Switch which
reports virtually no traffic utilization.  Even wrksysact shows the send
and recieve tasks using virtually no CPU and no I/O. I'm going to try
again with performance tools running but.....

This is pretty sad performance with this kind of horsepower. Any ideas
or similair experiences? Tweaks to the LIND or CTLD maybe?

 - Larry

-- 
Larry Bolhuis
Arbor Solutions, Inc.
(616) 451-2500
(616) 451-2571 -fax
lbolhuis@arbsol.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to 
MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: 
david@midrange.com
+---



+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.