× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



John Earl wrote:

>I've been curious about digest mode for a while now.   
>Does it have benefits over just filtering incoming 
>messages to a folder?   

Hi John!  Yes; the major benefit is to the disk space on my PC!  :-)  Each
message averages 5kb in size, including headers and the list sig at the
bottom.  When in digest mode, I get between 15 and 20 messages per email at
about 50kb per digest.  The secondary benefit is that I get to see if
somebody responded to "How can I see the folders in the IFS from a green
screen?" before adding my reply to the pile.  Finally, I am old-school: I
learnt email from Fidonet.  I'm very much accustomed to fetching a day's
worth of email, creating my replies and sending off those replies - all in a
batch.  The current email client I'm forced to use at work doesn't emulate
that very well, but digest mode helps.

>I prefer to drop everything from midrange-L@midrange.com 
>into my midrange-l folder and then sort through it at my
>leisure.  This gives me the added benefit of being able 
>to quickly eliminate subjects and authors that I don't care to read.

The twit filter is indeed a benefit to the "message at a time" scheme, and
one I miss in digest mode.  I found that when I got 150+ messages a day in
my "midrange" folder I tended to skip a lot of them. Something about the
sheer number.  I realise I'm getting the same amount of messages in digest
mode, but psychologically 5 digests a day seems easier to peruse than 150
messages...  :-)

>I only mention it because when I first decided that the midrange-l 
>volume was too burdonesome I tried digest-mode and found it to 
>be even more difficult to work with.  Filtering to a folder is a much 
>more manageable solution.

Actually, I agree that filtering is a Good Thing.  If only MS Outlook had
more sophisticated filtering.  Specifically, I'd like to write my own filter
macros.  Programmer mentality I guess.  "I just KNOW I can do a better job
than that!"  :-)  Maybe after the holidays I'll go back to individual
messages for a while and see if I can work with the filtering...  Gotta keep
an open mind!

Buck Calabro
Aptis; Albany, NY
"Nothing is so firmly believed as
 that which we least know" -- Michel Montaigne
Visit the Midrange archives at http://www.midrange.com
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.