RE: QLMTDEVSSN

also needs *NOMAX (many casinos have a generic 400 sign on and the security
handled within the application.  I don't like it either, but it's not going
to change in my lifetime)
Tom Westdorp
AS/400 Senior Programmer/Analyst 
  
IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Programmer
IBM Certified Specialist - RPG IV Developer 
Certified Master RPG IV Programmer 
Internal Telephone # 04-6859
Voice: (702) 221-6859
Fax:    (702) 221-6881
tom.westdorp@stationcasinos.com 



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bipes [mailto:chris.bipes@cross-check.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 7:19 AM
To: 'MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com'
Subject: RE: QLMTDEVSSN


Not a bad suggestion, but I would like to be able to override at the user
level.  So user profile would have something like:
Max Sessions: (*sysval or 1 - 99)

We have multiple occurrences of devices attached via protocol converters
running under the same user profile the basically reads the phony screen and
dumps to a data queue.  I would like to restrict general users to 1 session,
programmers to a few, and production devices to hundreds.  Ok so we have
about 49 under one profile, 21 under a another, 3 under a another.  Each
application has a unique profile to run a unique initial program.

Definitely not a dumb idea.


Christopher K. Bipes    mailto:ChrisB@Cross-Check.com
Sr. Programmer/Analyst  mailto:Chris_Bipes@Yahoo.com
CrossCheck, Inc.        http://www.cross-check.com
6119 State Farm Drive   Phone: 707 586-0551 x 1102
Rohnert Park CA  94928  Fax: 707 586-1884

If consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, only geniuses work here.
Karen Herbelin - Readers Digest 3/2000

-----Original Message-----
From: MacWheel99@aol.com [mailto:MacWheel99@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 2:37 AM
To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
Subject: QLMTDEVSSN


This is not a problem or a question, just another of my "I wish" for some 
future version of OS/400 bells & whistles.

This WRKSYSVAL is either 0 - only one session to a customer 
or 1 - unlimited sessions to each user.

I think that if IBM made this a 2 digit value & allowed something like 5 ...

meaning a user can have up to 5 concurrent sessions, this would be so much 
more useful when we have folks with multi-session devices, or tech support 
folks visiting different places but then we could have some reasonable limit

instead of one or no limit.

Just another of my dumb ideas.
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
david@midrange.com
+---
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---