Well, that was kinda my point. Sure, all of our dates are *stored* yyyymmdd.
But I doubt anyone, except for a few (including us), uses yyyymmdd for input.
So much for a standard.
I'm not sure of the reasons why, but I suspect our company did that because we
are international and, hence, no confusion between mm/dd/yy and dd/mm/yy.
Dan Bale
IT - AS/400
Handleman Company
248-362-4400 Ext. 4952
-------------------------- Original Message --------------------------
Umm... ISO stands for International Standards Organization. An ISO date
is YYYY-MM-DD. Isn't that the world standard? Or so ISO would hope anyway.
And, no, we don't use ISO for input, we use the American MM/DD/YY format.
Regards,
Jim Langston
D.BALE@handleman.com wrote:
> Hey! Sounds like a holy war coming on! <g>
>
> Certainly, most Americans would be very unfamiliar with dd/mm/yy, but using
> your logic, mm/dd/yy is even more screwy. I don't like to have to visually
> work through dd/mm/yy, although reading "15 March 2000" is, IMO, elegant.
Not
> much use for data storage & date processing, though.
>
> If there were to be a world standard (hah!), I would vote for yyyy/mm/dd.
>
> Dan Bale
> IT - AS/400
> Handleman Company
> 248-362-4400 Ext. 4952
+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---
