RE: OS400 DATA MIGRATION

I was speaking of cheaper in the sense of lost time, risk of lost data if
the machine dies while running unprotected, risk of lost data if one of the
backup tapes decides to be unreadable - that kind of cheaper.

In my opinion, people sometimes spend too much time worrying about hardware
cost.  How much would the expansion unit cost and what feature/function
would he get for it?  (that's a real question, not rhetorical)  How much
will a decent developer cost for the next year?  I would guess about
$100,000 with desk, floor space, phone, PC, wages, overhead, machine cycles
to support him, parking spot, and so forth.  How much will it cost to
rebuild the world if the backup turns out to be unreadable?  How much will
it cost in hours for the OP to fix if that happens?  How much will it cost
the business in lost opportunity while their people cannot use the system?

Hardware-corner-cutting is no more cost effective today than it was 30 years
ago.  We have to work harder to defend it because people will point to a
$3,000 PC.  I ask, "Is the PC the same as a 400?  Does it do the same stuff
and work as reliably?"  If not, then it doesn't matter.

Richard Jackson
mailto:richardjackson@richardjackson.net
http://www.richardjacksonltd.com
Voice: 1 (303) 808-8058
Fax:   1 (303) 663-4325

-|-----Original Message-----
-|From: owner-midrange-l@midrange.com
-|[mailto:owner-midrange-l@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Larry Bolhuis
-|Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:06 PM
-|To: MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com
-|Subject: Re: OS400 DATA MIGRATION
-|
-|
-|Richard,
-|
-|<Snip>(Agreed with all that)
-|
-|> If you
-|> were to add a new disk IOP, you could add the new 8gb drives balance the
-|> disk, then remove the 2 drives from the 10-drive raid set and
-|make them into
-|> a mirrored pair.  I suggest that this would be easier and safer
-|and cheaper
-|> than an unload-reload.
-|
-|  Problem is I don't think he has any place to put said controller.
-|There is only one reserved slot for Disk IOPs in the 50xx expansion
-|towers and it runs all disks in the attached top hat. Therefore he'll
-|need another expansion tower, top hat, AND disk controller. In which
-|case he wouldn't need to remove the 4GB drives at all!  While I Agree
-|that it'd be safer and faster, it'll not be cheaper!
-|
-|  Reminds me of the old adage, you can have any two of Fast, Cheap, and
-|Correct, but not all three!
-|
-|  - Larry
-|
-|--
-|Larry Bolhuis
-|Arbor Solutions, Inc.
-|(616) 451-2500
-|(616) 451-2571 -fax
-|lbolhuis@arbsol.com
-|+---
-|| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
-|| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
-|| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
-|| To unsubscribe from this list send email to
-|MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
-|| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator:
-|david@midrange.com
-|+---

+---
| This is the Midrange System Mailing List!
| To submit a new message, send your mail to MIDRANGE-L@midrange.com.
| To subscribe to this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-SUB@midrange.com.
| To unsubscribe from this list send email to MIDRANGE-L-UNSUB@midrange.com.
| Questions should be directed to the list owner/operator: david@midrange.com
+---